Situational Awareness,
Key Component of Safe Flight
Regardless of where or what you fly, pilots will probably find themselves
involved in training geared at helping pilots achieve and maintain high-level
situational awareness in the cockpit.
by Constance Bovier
This article was featured in the "Focus on Safety" section
of FLYING CAREERS magazine's January 1997 issue.
It is reprinted here with the permission of David
Jones, Editor-in-Chief. For FLYING CAREERS subscription information,
telephone (US) 1-800-492-1881.
The moment a student pilot releases the brakes and edges toward a taxiway,
"Where am I?" and "What's going on around me?" become
paramount concerns. From the first lesson, pilots learn that swift reactions
are good ... but not good enough. Getting ahead of the airplane is better.
Staying ahead of the airplane is best. Situation Awareness 101.
Scan a list of recent aircraft accidents and you quickly find situational
awareness-related tragedies like American Airlines Flight 965 that crashed
near Cali, Columbia, on Dec. 20, 1995. After months of study, American
reported that a confusing list of waypoints led to an incorrect data entry,
which programmed the flight management system to drive the B-757 into
a mountain. Distractions and misplaced priorities prevented the crew from
noticing that the FMS had changed their intended routing until it was
too late.
Then, on April 3, 1996, a U.S. Air Force CT-43A (B-737) crashed near
Dubrovnik, Croatia-another controlled flight into terrain. These and other
accidents hammer home the fact that even a highly trained professional
crew, flying good equipment, can find itself in circumstances where situational
awareness has diminished to the point of disaster.
A host of gremlins has always awaited the unwary pilot distractions,
ambiguities, poor communications, automation-induced complacency, fatigue,
etc. Today, training programs work hard to help Pilots achieve high-level
SA and to integrate their SA tools and knowledge into the overall array
of professional skills.
The Ace Factor
Researchers have studied situational awareness for years. It's no surprise
that the military coined the term-it's hard to imagine a more critical
SA environment than air combat. Vince Mancuso, coordinator of line operational
simulation for Delta Air Lines, is a former Air Force F-4 pilot who wrote
his Ph.D. dissertation on fighter pilot situational awareness. "The
most advanced work in SA has been done in the military," he said.
"This last year the U.S. Naval Tactical Air Warfare Center sponsored
a conference about SA in tactical environments. And for the last several
years the U.S. Air Force has been dedicating a lot of research money to
SA in fighters."
In a popular book focused on military flyers, The Ace Factor (1989),
author Mike Spick concluded that good SA is "the ace factor."
The top-scoring aces o f the two World Wars, he wrote, generally avoided
high confusion melees and excelled by picking off stragglers. "This
is ... a form of SA. The aces were very aware of their own limitations
and tended to keep out of situations with which they could not cope adequately."
Modern combat, he noted, depends heavily upon electronics and AWACS technology.
Today's fighter pilot SA "lies mainly in the ability to make use
of the presented information."
1. Predetermine crew roles for high-workload phases
of flight.
2. Develop a plan and assign responsibilities for handling problems and
distractions.
3. Solicit input from all crew members including cabin, ATC, maintenance,
dispatch, etc.
4. Rotate attention from plane to path to people - don't fixate.
5. Monitor and evaluate current status relative to your plan.
6. Project ahead and consider contingencies.
7. Focus on the details and scan the big picture.
8. Create visual and/or aural reminders of interrupted tasks.
9. Watch for clues of degraded SA.
10. Speak up when you see SA breaking down.
Sources: Vince Mancuso, Pete Wolfe and SA Tiger
Team
What Good SA Looks Like
Among the researchers who study SA in civilian cockpits is Judith Orasanu,
principle investigator for NASA-Ames Research Center. "We started
looking at flight crews' decision-making behavior," she said. "But
you can't have a decision out of an emergent situation in flight unless
you're aware that you have a problem. That's where SA comes in."
Researchers like Orasanu typically present their findings at aviation
conferences and other industry events. Nonetheless, there's been a historical
gulf between academia and the practical application of SA in pilot training.
Until now.
"Research reports aren't written in a way that an airline manager
or pilot can use," said Mancuso. "They require a lot of work
and translation." This can be a major problem for smaller carriers,
such as many regional airlines, that lack academic folks in their training
departments. Many companies depend upon pilots who volunteer during their
time off to develop and deliver training.
"I knew there had to be a way to build a bridge between all the
great research that's going on and the people who are designing the pilot
training programs," Mancuso said, "so ultimately the pilot would
become the recipient."
Mancuso's frustration over the status quo led him to mastermind an industry
wide task force to address the problem. The Situation Awareness Management
Tiger Team of the Industry Human Factors/CRM Developers Group is a small
cadre of training people from various airlines and researchers (including
Orasanu) from the civilian and military communities. "The concept
of this group was to do the labor-intensive work Vince Mancuso, Pete Wolfe
and SA Tiger Team that leads up to development of a sound training program,"
said Mancuso.
The SA Tiger Team recently created and produced materials that any airline
or aircraft operator can adapt for its own pilot training: a model SA
course outline, a paper titled "Managing Situation Awareness on the
Flight Deck or The Next Best Thing to a Crystal Ball," by Sheryl
Chappell (published in ASRS' DirectLine), a statistical study of SA related
ASRS reports and a heavy-duty bibliography of SA research and publications.
"You need to have frequencies laid out, know
your routing, have your sectionals and en route charts out. So if you
do get a changed clearance, you can get a quick visual reference and youÕll
be familiar with all the fixes and navaids."
Plane, Path, People
The upshot of the Tiger Team's work is the situation awareness management
plan. This plan is the foundation for building individual and crew situational
awareness.
Mancuso stressed that the management of situational awareness is a skill
with definite actions and behaviors. The SA management plan reminds pilots
to direct attention to the plane, the path and the people. What's going
on right now? And what's likely to happen ahead?
To focus on the present, a crew should monitor and evaluate current status-both
the big picture and all the details. But it's important to remember that
knowing and understanding the current state of affairs simply keeps you
up with the aircraft. It doesn't put you ahead.
To get ahead, you must project into the future, anticipating what will
happen with the plane, the path and the people involved if the current
situation continues. Consider what-ifs. What if you have to make a missed
approach? What if the weather goes down at your destination?
10 Clues to Loss of SA
These clues can warn of an "error chain"
in progress - a series of events that may lead to an accident. Most accidents
involving human error include at least four of these clues.
1. Ambiguity-information from two or more sources
that doesn't agree.
2. Fixation-focusing on any one thing to the exclusion of everything else.
3. Confusion-uncertainty or bafflement about a situation (often accompanied
by anxiety or psychological discomfort).
4. Failure to fly the plane everyone is focused on non-flying activities.
5. Failure to look outside-everyone heads down.
6. Failure to meet expected checkpoint on flight plan or profile-ETA,
fuel burn, etc.
7. Failure to adhere to standard operating procedures.
8. Failure to comply with limitations, minimums, FARs, etc.
9. Failure to resolve discrepancies- contradictory data or personal conflicts.
10. Failure to communicate fully and effectively- vague or incomplete
statements.
Adapted from Douglas Schwartz, FlightSafety International
Tiger Team member Pete Wolfe, CRM and human factors chairman for Southwest
Airlines, pointed out that all pilots learn to "aviate, navigate
and communicate," and plane/path/people is an update of that foundation
concept. He cited a familiar example of exceptional CRM: United Airlines
Flight 232, a DC-10 that crash-landed in Sioux City, Iowa, on July 19,1989.
A NASA study of the cockpit voice recorder transcript revealed that Capt.
Al Haynes, while bringing the badly damaged aircraft back to earth, shifted
his attention and communications with the crew in a continuous loop. How
much damage was there to the plane? How was it behaving? Could they control
it? What was the status of the troubled flight path? Where could they
land? And how might they do it? What were each of the people doing as
they worked their way toward a common solution? Round and round again.
"Effective SA management demands that kind of attention," Wolfe
said, "a continuous rotation from plane to path to people."
SA Traps
Unfortunately, in non-emergency situations, human beings are lackluster
monitors. Attention meanders away from the business at hand or becomes
preoccupied with one troublesome aspect of a flight.
Mancuso said that research shows ambiguous problems often cause pilots
the most difficulty. "Even in a severe emergency like a fire or engine
failure, they tend to do better than if they spend a lot of time trying
to figure out an ambiguous problem where there's no clear-cut course of
action." He said that Delta has incorporated some of the newest SA
research in its pilot recurrent training for 1997, and simulator scenarios
include both clear-cut and ambiguous problems. Videotaped debriefings
show crews how well they managed, particularly whether or not they got
fixated, "with nobody minding the store."
Research has also identified distractions as the No. 1 cause of course
deviations. So Delta training scenarios interject a low priority distraction-such
as a flight attendant call during short final in weather-when the crew
should not attend to it. "We want to see if they're going to take
the bait," Mancuso said. The point is not to trick the crew, he explained,
but to reveal any tendency to get distracted or to misprioritize time.
"Their attention, their SA, can be managed."
"Anyone with some flying experience has been
caught off guard or unprepared. We're all familiar with the feeling of
being ahead of or behind a situation."
Individual SA
In early flying, SA often resides in the seat of the pants. Ken Doucette,
assistant chief flight instructor at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
in Florida, said that one of the earliest forms of SA is stall recognition-"What
it feels like to be in that flight environment-the pitch attitude, the
sound of the engine noise, the air passing over the fuselage."
At ERAU, situational awareness hits full force in commercial pilot training
as the student studies the concepts of crew resource management and learns
to anticipate emergency situations in IFR flight. If ATC reroutes a flight,
Doucette said, "Students have to take an amended clearance, readjust
what they were going to do and do something different."
Doucette believes the critical key to single-pilot SA is preflight organization
and preparation. "You need to have frequencies laid out, know your
routing, have your sectionals and en route charts out. So if you do get
a changed clearance, you can get a quick visual reference and you'll be
familiar with all the fixes and navaids." That can help a pilot make
a quicker mental adjustment, he said, "SO it's not a major evolution
to figure out what to do next."
The danger for a disorganized pilot is task saturation, with SA slippage
close behind. "The thing that stops that," Doucette said, "is
being prepared."
Crew SA
Preparation is vital in crew cockpits as well; so is shared responsibility
for collective SA. Note: A situationally aware captain and a situationally
aware first officer don't necessarily add up to a situationally aware
crew. High-level crew SA can be thwarted by assumptions, inattention,
inadequate communication, etc. even by a rugged individualist in the left
seat who subtly (or not so subtly) discourages input. Yet every crew member
should augment the SA of the pilot in command. The level of the PIC's
awareness will heighten or limit the combined SA level of the crew.
Proof? A 1994 NTSB study of 37 accidents revealed that one or more crewmembers
failed to monitor and/or challenge the errors or lack of awareness of
their fellows in 31 of those events.
At FlightSafety International, Douglas Schwartz, director of the operations
and standards division, said, "Our approach to crew resource management
is to relate everything we teach back to situation awareness. We say that
assertion or advocacy is a communication style that's effective for increasing
others' situational awareness. Inquiry, asking questions, is a communication
style you would use to increase your own SA."
Keeping other crew members informed can be as simple as relaying the
last communication with ATC or asking for a little closer backup than
usual if you're feeling tired. Or saying that you're uneasy about the
numbers showing up on the computer ... and you're not sure why.
Pilots should also learn to read the cues and take appropriate action.
Since SA is a state of mind, we can't see when somebody has it or doesn't.
But we can see SA exhibited in words and actions.
If a captain pulls back on the throttles, it's a good sign that he's
aware the speed was a tad too fast. If a first officer says, "I'll
call ahead and check the weather," it's a good indication he's noticed
the thunderstorm building on the horizon.
Not all cues are good signs, of course. Maybe you can't believe your
eyes as your captain or first officer lines up for approach to the wrong
runway. Believe it. Point it out. Remember the experienced airline crew
that delivered a planeload of passengers to the wrong airport in the wrong
city in Europe.
The Mental Jumpseat
"Anyone with some flying experience has been caught off guard or
unprepared," Mancuso said. "We're all familiar with the feeling
of being on ahead of or behind a situation." He likened good SA to
having the ability to visualize sitting on the jumpseat of your own flight.
"In the Air Force we used to call it chair-flying," he said.
"We're trying to get pilots to think about the way they are thinking,
to take a giant step back."
While professional crews enjoy the advantage of LOFT scenarios and videotaped
debriefings, even people at the single-pilot stage of their careers can
learn to see and think about where they are and what's going on around
them from a new perspective. And anyone can adopt the SA Management Plan
as a personal checklist.
For some pilots, like the aces, high-level situational awareness may
be second nature. But for all pilots-individuals and crews-situational
awareness management is a set of skills that can be readily learned and
steadily refined.
Constance Bovier is a Houston-based aviation writer. She is a frequent
contributor to Flying Careers.
|