> "Statistics show that approximately 65 percent of all fatal air carrier
> accidents list human error as a probable cause," said Dr. Herman Rediess,
> director of the Office of Aviation Research."
> By probable cause, are we talking about primary cause or causal factors?
> If it is the latter, do we count ATC, Maintenance, design atc. as human error?
> At the risk of sounding pedantic, I believe human error is a contributory
> factor in 100% of aircraft accidents. This does not aim to legitimise human
> error, but to remind us of the importance of work in the area.
> Air traffic controllers, weather forecasters, maintenance engineers,
> designers etc. are all human and therefore prone to human error.
> If we are talking about primary cause then that is a different matter, but
> then let me pose this question:
> If an airliner has a crash in Australia (God forbid), who will determine
> what contribution it has to accident statistics that are based on primary
> cause? The Australian Bureau of Air Safety which investigates accidents in
> Australia stopped using 'primary cause' years ago and now only uses
> 'Findings' and 'Significant Factors'.
> Dr. Graham Braithwaite
> Department of Aviation
> University of New South Wales
> Sydney 2052
> Australia
> Tel: +61 (0) 2 9385 6757
> Fax: +61 (0) 2 9385 6637
> Mobile: 0414 736 467