RE: leadership Training is an ART not a science

Mitchell, David A (mitchelld2_at_azng-mail.army.mil)
Wed, 3 Mar 1999 15:13:47 -0700


I AGREE, BUT CONSIDER TRAINING AIRCREWS MUCH OF FLYING IS A SCIENCE AND
TENDS TO DRAW PEOPLE WHO ARE SCIENCE MINDED

THE CHALLANGE OF AVIATION LEADERSHIP TRAINING IS MERGING THE TWO. SCIENCE
AND ART.

-----Original Message-----
From: AAdamski_at_aol.com [mailto:AAdamski_at_aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 1999 12:28 PM
To: crm-devel_at_db.erau.edu
Subject: Re: leadership Training is an ART not a science

Hello CRMers:

Yep! This is a great discussion and it's time for me to put forth my two-
cents! I would argue that leadership training in itself is not an art but
it
is based on science (Learning theory, instructional design, etc.).
Leadership,
however, is an art. The training program can provide all the theory,
techniques, methods, examples, case studies, etc. that is compiled in every
textbook, the experiences of successful leaders, and good examples to
follow;
yet the learner cannot lead effectively.

I use the analogy of learning how to oil paint. You can be provided all the
paint, brushes, canvas, etc. necessary to produce beautiful work, but you
can't paint worth a %#*! Leadership like fine art painting is an art.

Comments?

Regards,
Tony A. (The other Tony)