Perhaps we need a new CRM subject area -- sense of humor. :-)
On the other hand, we DID generate some good discussion. Keep it up,
everyone!
Best regards,
Neil Krey
neilkrey_at_mail.airmail.net
http://web2.airmail.net/neilkrey/
-----Original Message-----
From: Jo-Anne Hamilton <jmh24_at_ozemail.com.au>
To: crm-devel_at_db.erau.edu <crm-devel_at_db.erau.edu>
Date: Tuesday, March 31, 1998 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: CRM in Action
>
>Dear All,
>
>It was tongue in cheek. Sorry! I won't do it again!
>
>Jo-Anne
>
>
>
>CRMDEEN wrote:
>>
>> I would quite agree with Kieth. If a crew must resort to "emergency
talk",
>> that is good mishap prevention, but if the crew had been functioning
>> effectively all along, they would not have needed the intervention
strategy.
>> I often hear crews debrief CRM by saying "we got confused, someone called
>> 'Time Out', and therefore we did good CRM today". Wrong answer, I said.
If
>> the pilot flies a stable and precise approach, a "go around" won't be
needed
>> unless an outside trigger creates a mishap potential. Then, an
intervention
>> strategy, tool, or technique must be employed. I think we need
prevention
>> and intervention teaching.
>> Greg Deen
>> Raytheon
>