Re: Recency Research

John Bent (jbent_at_glink.net.hk)
Tue, 03 Jun 1997 05:57:20 +0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Previous message: John Bent: "Re: Where is the diagnosis?"
Maybe in reply to: Chris Kriechbaum: "Recency Research"

Research into recency would be valuable. I suspect that many share a basic
concern that moving reccurrent training to single visit and beyond, reduces
standards (assuming that the quality of the training remains unchanged). I
also suspect that other tools of measurement (of the NORMAL operation) such
as 100% DFDR/QAR feedback, and Line Observation Flights, will help to fill
the gap between recurrent sessions.

John Bent

At 08:16 AM 6/3/97 +1200, you wrote:
>CRMres,
>
>Does anyone know if there has been any research done on the effect of
>increasing the time between simulator rides on technical and CRM
>proficiency, ie moving to single visit training and checking, from double
>visit training and checking.
>
>Regards,
>
>Capt. Chris Kriechbaum
>Air New Zealand
>
>
>

Previous message: John Bent: "Re: Where is the diagnosis?"
Maybe in reply to: Chris Kriechbaum: "Recency Research"