Re: The another alleged rogue
inmae (inmae_at_house.com.ar)
Wed, 08 Jul 1998 07:44:15 -0300
Stephen, Jean, all
> There is no
> clear indication that any of the "incidents" are clearly documented or
> provable. If the "incidents" came so close to hull loss or serious
> damage presumably they were subject of investigation by NZ air safety or
> equivalent; if they were not then the fisrt question is - Why not?
> Secondly, were the "incidents" investigated by the company? What was
> the outcome of either or both of these investigations - if they occured?
Are you proposing to wait until an incident or an accident occur and
then
take some accion, reactively?
Don«t have we learned to think pro-actively?
Perhaps the perspective from an academic point of view is different to
the one we have every day in the trinch.
Best regards
PS: Come on Greg, Dave, Vince, we are wainting you to jump in.