It makes no difference the technology, one must still be aware of HARD SPOTS!
Terry Phillips
tep01_at_earthlink.net
At 16:11 1/27/97 -0400, you wrote:
>
>I am sure that since as I am led to believe that the airforce 737 involoved
>in the accident did not even have a CVR or a FDR it would also be equipped
>with your old type gauges.
>
>Situational awareness is very low in my opinion during an NDB approach
specialy
>during windy condition, in which head or tail wind might drasticly alter the
>ground speed at which the aircraft if flying at.
>
>NDB approaches that are not complemented by a DME or number of fixes\radial
>of near my VOR would create such a highmargin of lack of situational
>awarness specialy taking into consideration that an NDB will only let you
>how far you are from it when you cross it.
>
>I do not mean to take any attention away from the cali crash, but I think
>anytime a plane hits a mountain a voice in the pilots head must at one point
>have said are we? and due to lack of situational awarness it was either too
>late to react and correct, or a false signal was sent to the pilots and they
>continued on it, or how bad can the reslut be syndrom\ how far off can we
>really be???
>
>Tareq
>
>>The 737 accident with Brown is indeed a good case to compare to the Cali
>>incident. It was, I believe, a steam gauge aircraft. Situational awareness
>>seems to be more at the heart of the issue though. NDB approaches offer
>>particular difficulty to a good number of pilots. I wonder if this was a
>>factor in the 737 accident. (This one I have not read the report on)
>>--
>>Donald Anders Talleur email: dtalleur_at_uiuc.edu
>>Institute of Aviation- Willard Airport
>>Aviation Research Laboratory- 244-8687
>>Pilot Training- 244-8606
>>
>>If at first you don't succeed, find out if the loser gets anything!
>>(Bill Lyon: Philadelphia)
>>
>>
>
>
>