RE: Thanks for the advice

Guillermo Bolibar (gbolibar_at_sminter.com.ar)
Sat, 19 Dec 1998 18:02:39 -0300

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_01AE_01BE2B79.C3F67A20
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Steve wrote:

".........A necessary part of CRM is the realization that the High
Situationally Aware crewmemember must help the Low Situationally =
Aware...."
=20
After have red the interesting discussion about whether the IP was right =
or wrong, and having on the list cases in where he should be right =
(Jeff's C 21 case itself) and wrong ( Hahn Pete's Navy E-6 at Travis =
AFB)=20
=20
Where must we look for clues to be sure who is wrong and who is right in =
a time pressure situation? It is not better, during ambiguities to =
systematically take the safest option, even if at the end it was wrong; =
and then, once the aircraft is secured and the ambiguity solved; to =
proceed by the right path?=20

Cheers,
Guillermo Bolibar

------=_NextPart_000_01AE_01BE2B79.C3F67A20
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">

Steve = wrote:

".........A necessary=20 part of CRM is the realization that the High
Situationally Aware = crewmemember=20 must help the Low Situationally Aware...."
 
After have = red the=20 interesting discussion about whether the IP was right or wrong, and = having on=20 the list cases in where he should be right (Jeff's C 21 case itself) and = wrong (=20 Hahn Pete's Navy E-6 at Travis AFB)
 
Where must we look for = clues to be=20 sure who is wrong and who is right in a time pressure situation? It is = not=20 better, during ambiguities to systematically take the safest option, = even if at=20 the end it was wrong; and then, once the aircraft is secured and the = ambiguity=20 solved; to proceed by the right path?
 
Cheers,
Guillermo = Bolibar
------=_NextPart_000_01AE_01BE2B79.C3F67A20--