----------
> From: Major Tony T. Kern, 472-4727 <KernTT.DFH.USAFA_at_usafa.af.mil>
> To: crm-devel_at_db.erau.edu
> Subject: re:Re: Rogues
> Date: Wednesday, August 20, 1997 10:51 AM
>
> Keith and colleagues
>
> Keith Hendy makes an excellent point about the potential for a "witch
> hunt" here, and I am beginning to wonder if it was worth putting out
> preliminary thoughts on a critical subject in an open forum like this
one.
> It may have been irresponsible of me to begin to share ideas without
> putting the complete data set out for everyone to see. Of course, I
> couldn't do that since it is not completed yet.
>
> Indeed I have applied the PRELIMINARY data and criteria to successful
> high achievers as a control group, and seem to find one or two key
> differences. First is a pathological disregard for the truth. True
> rogues manipulate information for personal aggrandizement and gain.
> Secondly, rogues (by my early definition) are most definitely NOT team
> players, unless the team goals align themselves coincidentally with their
> own.
>
> Awareness is the goal at this stage, not selection or termination. I
> believe that there is some worthwhile information here in an embryonic
> stage. I wanted to share it early because I think it important to safety
> and efficiency, and if even one Bud Holland is identified between now and
> the time the research is complete and published, it was probably worth
> while. Again, I did not intend for this academic forum to start
> formulating any organizational policy. But if it helps you keep your
> antenna tuned a little better . . .
>
> Was Bader a rogue? I don't think so, at least not by my criteria.
>
> Tony K.