The 3 years is only for formally facilitated case study seminar work.
I would be reluctant to refer to it as 'academic'. There is also much
in the concepts of Keith Hendy on captaincy and decision-making which
we will need to look at as well.
Regards,
Rob
---"Bauer, Kenneth, CAPT, XOOT" <bauerk_at_af.pentagon.mil> wrote:
>
> Rob, 3 years would seem to be an excessive time for someone to
retain
> skills without use. Do you practice CRM in between the 3 year
academic
> refresher (LOFT, in the aircraft scenarios, etc.)? Have you looked
at a
> reduction in reducing emphasis on academic training and increasing
the
> emphasis on the operational skills in a LOFT/Simulator exercise for
the
> follow on training? The idea, if they remember the material well,
then
> allowing them to practice the skill may be more beneficial than just
an
> academic refresher. Thoughts
>
> Ken
> ----------
> From: Rob Collyer
> To: crm-devel_at_db.erau.edu; crm-devel_at_db.erau.edu
> Subject: Re: Currency Requirements For CRM
> Date: Tuesday, August 12, 1997 6:32PM
>
>
> MAJ Alex Babty raised the issue of currency for CRM training. Our
> view is that in a military organisation the refresher training for
CRM
> will be conducted on the same basis as aviation medicine refresher
> training. At present that is every three years. The initial training
> is skills based, with every module requiring a clearly identifieable
> skill to be transferred - otherwise the module was not inlcuded in
the
> seminar type course. We envisage that the refresher training will be
> case study based.
>
> Incidently, we are also looking at a layered validation of CRM (which
> we call Aviation Team Training - ATT). The first level is the normal
> end of course validation that most organisation which use a systems
> approach employ. The second level is a pre-course, one-month post
> course and 12 months post course questionnaire/interview approach
> looking at the transfer of team skills training. The final level is
> the difficult one and will probably take a few years, but we are
> looking to try to develop an objective measure based on simulation
> flight. Just about everyone who has done the ATT so far is very
> enthusiastic about it, but while a warm fuzzy feeling is good for
> morale and other aspects of organisational climate, it doesn't
justify
> the expense of a course which purports to achieve other objectives
too.
>
> I will continue to follow our discussion about CRM validation with
> great interst,
>
> Rob Collyer
>
>
>
>
> ---Maj Alex Bapty <Baptya_at_do.aetc.af.mil> wrote:
> >
> > Just a few questions. Any answers or opinions are appreciated.
> >
> > There is currently a concern for standardization and level of
> sophistication in CRM training. We have basically three approaches
> to CRM training for operational aircrew. A classroom only
> lecture/facilitation type, a classroom facilitation with Mission
> oriented simulator training (LOFT) reinforcement type, and a PC based
> interactive mission type. Which one is the correct approach? Is
> there a wrong approach?
> >
> > How often is CRM training required? Can currency requirements be
> based on experience level
> > of aircrew? How much CRM training is required? How do you measure
> it's effectiveness? What do you do for aircrew members that do not
> have a station in the simulator? How realistic does the training
have
> to
> > be?
> > Should CRM be integrated in the everyday environment in place of or
> in addition to annual CRM training? How do you integrate the
> training into everyday operations without it becoming just another
> square filler in the over tasked mission environment?
> >
> >
> >
> > Maj Alex Bapty
> > HQ AETC/DOFA
> > CRM Program Manager
> > DSN 487-5010
> > Comm (210) 652-5010
> > baptya_at_do.aetc.af.mil
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
!
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com
>
>
_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com